What to do with a crisis … of leadership

by Ivanna Pinyak

Over the last couple of years the word crisis must have become one the most most frequently pronounced words in the world. Just check for it in Google! Financial crisis, social crisis, European crisis, French football crisis…

The Crisis of Leadership: that was the title chosen for the 5th Summer University of Democracy organised by the Council of Europe and held this week. The annual event aims at bringing together young active citizens and decision makers in Politics, Economics, Society and Culture from the now 16 schools representing the “non-EU” Member States of the Council of Europe. Young leaders from Russia, Georgia, Bulgaria, Moldova, Kosovo, “The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,” Serbia, Croatia, Romania, Armenia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Albania, Montenegro and Belarus, as well a number of international and European experts and prominent political figures exchanged their viewpoints on leadership and crisis. 

Amongst the multitude of topics discussed, were: the crisis of leadership in the globalised and multipolar world, challenges for US president Obama and the problems of leadership in Europe, the Copenhagen summit and the crisis of the European project, the so-called frozen conflicts on the territories of the former Soviet Union countries and painful transformations in Russia.

The steady wide-ranging crisis – if that is what we face now – must have its reasons or its meaning. And the meaning of this is that actually the modern world is undergoing important changes. The way is changing so fast that we won’t have to wait our whole lives to figure out what happened. The changes are, and will be, so important, that, yes, we might not recognise the usual way of being in a couple of years.

It is actually fascinating to observe, to analyse, to predict the near future, and to project yourself, your community, your country and your continent into one of the possible scenarios of what tomorrow will be like.

The era of incontestable, charismatic leaders as seen during World War II has long gone. Since the world went multipolar, with the rise of new technologies and Internet, access to information has become very easy, everybody can take initiative and power of expression on blogs and social networks challenging the “official” media. The latter have to adapt to that new reality. Society is more informed and individuals are more educated on matters of global concern. Civil society, in some places called the 3rd sector becomes the real power and factor of influence. Even if you personally don’t think you are able somehow to influence large-scale decisions at this moment in time, your active stance and your opinion do matter in these circumstances. The crisis of leadership means that the globalised, multipolar world with its multitude of actors is no longer under the total control of any government.

Civil society, which is the active citizens’ movement, forms the real 3rd power. It can define trends, form a basis and thus influence further decisions taken on a political level. The European Union project is in crisis as it couldn’t be promoted by mere elites. Remember the non-votes? Now, the collective intelligence and voices of active citizens speaking up is something to remedy the lack of democracy in the EU, this is the key to help it keep going.

Passion for football

by Ivanna Pinyak

Generally, there are two kinds of people: those who love football and those who don’t. However, even those who don’t would definitely follow the most prestigious international championships or at least they would check the scores. The World Cup football championship is in the very centre of attention and 22 guys chasing a ball on the big screen might be the biggest action ever. Looks like no other large-scale event in sports, like the Tennis Grand Slam or the Olympic Games could have that strong an emotional impact on the population.

Ivanna is a freelance journalist, now living in Strasbourg after growing up in the Ukraine. She speaks Ukrainian, English, French, Polish and German. Her specific areas of interest are Human Rights and Europe.

What’s remarkable about the World Cup?

First of all, the World Cup football championship is an effective international brand marketing of a nation. Consequently, supporting your national team is an act of patriotism. Your team’s performance in the World Cup is either a national hope and pride, or sorrow and disappointment. Sorry for France, feeling “blue” for the “bleus”.

Secondly, you can watch the national teams you’ve probably never seen playing before. North Korea was a real surprise: an excellent team, in good shape, strong in defence as well as in attack, they lost the game, but assured a last-minute honour-saving goal! 1:2 against Brazil, less outstanding this time, but still “Brazil”.

Thirdly, the World Cup is always the reason to raise some complex questions that accompany the event. This time everyone started to talk about South Africa. Media and public opinion would focus more interest onto this country, its culture, its people, their lives and their problems. The World Cup -2010 was also the reason to rewind the documentaries and investigations about corruption inside FIFA.

Finally, the European football championship winner is no longer the favourite in the World Cup competition. Let’s wish good luck to Spain! Europeans should cheer up, as Germans have shown a very promising start with that merciless score against Australia. But, why would I say Europeans? Does it seem to be the right identity for the world football competition?

A lot of progressive European citizens might have thought about it. Some friends of mine were wondering if football could ever overcome national ambitions. Or if the EU could ever afford a European football team to represent Europe for the next World Cup, instead of sending France, Slovakia, Germany and others… Nowadays it might sound like a pretty science-fiction scenario. While the European project’s future is so vague, who would wish to have a team as efficient and as quick as the European political process? On the other hand, who knows if the common European football team would see its chances – to win or even to be qualified for the championship – multiplied or divided proportionally to the number of Member States?

Anyway, however utopian might appear the idea, the day a single European football team plays in the World Cup, we’ll be talking of the true European identity. As the football identity is a consolidating factor.

Football is a moderating, generating and peace-keeping action.

The European Parliament, for example, has recently voted to keep on financing the International Funds for Ireland. The latter aims at reconciling the hostile communities in Northern Ireland while investing in sports and associative initiatives, “Football for Peace” being one of its most successful projects. The same sport-based initiative is being used to promote Jewish and Arab community relations and reconciliation. Football is passion, just like jealousy or hatred, in the origin of any conflict. Passion is what makes us complete, fun and vulnerable, split and united in what we share. Passion is irrational, but amongst all sorts of passions, more or less important or sustainable, football is a global one, and, thus, unifying.